This section is dedicated to those current Chris Williams’ cases, and those he has pursued in the past. All of these cases show Chris’ interest in defending his constitutionally protected rights and seeing that those who would deprive us of those rights, are exposed in the process. All entries are listed in chronological order by year/month/date and may also include his business enterprises being named in those actions.
SECTION 1.0) CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS v. CITY OF LEMON GROVE ET AL – Case No. 37-2024-00008590-CU-WM-CTL
1.0) 24/02/23: Petition for Writ of Mandate (ROA-1)
1.0) 24/02/23: Civil Case Cover Sheet (ROA-2)
1.0) 24/02/23: SUMMONS (ROA-3)
1.0) 24/02/29: POS (ROA-6)
1.0) 24/03/29: LG’s Answer (ROA-7)
SECTION 1.1) CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS v DAVID ARAMBLA ET AL. – CASE NO: 37-2018-00023369-CU-PO-CTL – COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
1.1) 18/05/11: Williams’s Complaint (ROA-1)
1.1) 18/06/22: City of Lemon Grove’s (“LG”) Answer (ROA-10)
1.1) 18/06/29: Declaration of Emily M Straub iso Arambula’s Motion to Strike (ROA-14)
1.1) 18/06/29: Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities_iso Arambula’s MTS (ROA-15)
1.1) 18/10/05: Minute Order (ROA-29)
1.1) 18/11/21: LG’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication (ROA-35)
1.1) 18/12/27: LG’s Reply to Williams’s Opposition (ROA-44)
1.1) 18/12/28: Williams’s Objections to Defendant’s Evidence Submitted on Reply (ROA-45)
1.1) 19/01/19: Williams’s Brief In Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ROA-55)
1.1) 19/01/25: Williams’s Separate_Statement_of_Disputed_Facts (ROA-56)
1,1) 19/01/25: Williams’s Objections_to_Evidence_Submitted iso Motion for Summary Judgment (ROA-57)
1.1) 19/03/08: Declaration_of_Emily_M_Straub iso Arambula’s Motion to Compel (ROA-69)
1.1) 19/03/08: Separate_Statement iso Arambula’s Motion to Compe (ROA-70)l
1.1) 19/03/08: Notice_of_Lodgment iso Armabula’s Motion to Compel (ROA-71)
1.1) 19/03/08: Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities iso Arambula’s Motion to Compel (ROA-74)
1.1) 19/06/07: Reply_Brief_ISO_MTC_Depo_Answers_RFP_of_Williams (ROA-78)
1.1) 19/06/27: Notice_of_Motion_to_Compel_Deposition_Attendance of Matt Mendoza (ROA-84)
1.1) 19/06/27: Williams’s Opening_Brief_iso_Motion_to Compel Deposition of Matt Mendoza (ROA-85)
1.1) 19/06/27: Proposed_Order_Granting_Williams’s Motion_for Mendoza and Sanctions (ROA-86)
1.1) 19/10/18: Wiliams’s Reply_Brief_iso Motion_to_Compel Deposition of Matt Mendoza (ROA-89)
1.1) 19/10/25: Notice_of_Ruling (ROA-91)
1.1) 19/12/05: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-100)
1.1) 19/12/05: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-103)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-105)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-106)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-107)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-108)
1.1) 19/12/06: ROA-109_Motion_in_Limine (ROA-109)
1.1) 19/12/06: ROA-110_Motion_in_Limine (ROA-110
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-111)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-112)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-113)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-114)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-115)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-116)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-117)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-118)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-119)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-120)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-121)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-122)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-123)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-124)
1.1) 19/12/06: Motion_in_Limine (ROA-126)
1.1) 22/03/18: Advance_Trial_Review_Order (ROA-149)
1.1) 22/03/18: Minute_Order
1.1) 22/03/22: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_2 of 23 (ROA-154)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_3 of 23 (ROA-155)
1.1) 22/08/04: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_4 of 23 (ROA-156)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_5 of 23 (ROA-157)
1.1) 22/08/03: Wiliams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_6_of 23 (ROA-158)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_7 of 23 (ROA-159)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_9 of 23 (ROA-160)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_10 of 23 (ROA-161)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_14 of 23 (ROA-162)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_15 of 23 (ROA-163)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_17 of 23 (ROA-164)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_19 of 23 (ROA-165)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_21 of 23 (ROA-166)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_22 of 23 (ROA-167)
1.1) 22/08/03: Williams’s Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_23 of 23 (ROA-168)
1.1) 22/08/04: Williams’s Trial_Brief (ROA-169)
1.1) 22/08/05: Minute_Order (ROA-173)
1.1) 22/08/12: Minute_Order (ROA-181)
1.1) 23/02/03: Minute_Order (ROA-185)
1.1) 23/02/24: Minute_Order (ROA-195)
1.1) 23/02/24: Minute_Order (ROA-197)
1.1) 23/03/01: Minute_Order (ROA-207)
1.1) 23/03/02: Minutes Finalized for Jury Trial (ROA-213)
1.1) 23/03/06:Jury_Instructions (ROA-218)
1.1) 23/02/28: Jury_Instructions (ROA-220)
1.1) 23/02/28: Arambula’s Exhibit_List (ROA-221)
1.1) 23/05/10: ROA-222 Judgment Screen Shot
SECTION 1.2) RICARDO VIDAL ET AL v. CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS ET AL – CASE NO. 37-2018-00044217-CU-BC-CTL
1.2) 18/08/31: Vidal Complaint (ROA-1)
1.2) 2022/03/04: Judgment by Court After Trial (ROA-116)
SECTION 2.0) BILLAUER v. ECK CASE NO. 37-2021-00006367-CU-DF-CTL
2.0) 21/02/16: Billauer v. Eck Complaint (ROA-1)
2.0) 21/03/26: McCaskill Dec iso 30 Day Extension for Demurrer and Motion to Strike (ROA-10)
2.0) 21/04/28: Eck’s Notice of Demurrer and (ROA-16)
2.0) 21/04/28: Eck’s MPA iso Eck’s Demurrer (ROA-18)
2.0) 21/04/28: Dec of Scott McCaskill iso of Ecks Motion to Strike (ROA-22)
2.0) 21/04/28: MPA iso of Eck’s MTS (ROA-23)
2.0) 21/04/28: Gina Austin files Eck’s Cross Complaint (ROA-26)
2.0) 21/06/01: Billauer’s Answer to Eck’s X Complaint (ROA-32)
2.0) 21/07/14: Billauer’s EP Application for OST and Request to Extend antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-34)
2.0) 21/07/14: Eck’s Opposition to Billauer’s EP App for OST and Extending antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-35)
2.0) 21/07/14: McCaskill Dec iso of Eck’s Opp to Billauer’s Extending antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-36)
2.0) 21/07/15: Minute Order (ROA-38)
2.0) 21/08/18: Billauer’s Opening Brief (ROA-41)
2.0) 21/08/18: Billauer’s Notice of Lodging (ROA-42)
2.0) 21/09/20: Eck’s Dec iso of Opp to Billauer’s Extending antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-54)
2.0) 21/09/21: Eck’s Objections in Evidence (ROA-55)
2.0) 21/09/20: Gina Austin files Eck’s Opposition to Billauer’s MTS (ROA-57)
2.0) 21/09/20: Billauer’s First Amended Complaint (ROA-58)
2.0) 21/09/28: Tentative Rulings (ROA-60)
2.0) 21/09/28: Tentative Rulings (ROA-61)
2.0) 23/02/28: Billauer v Eck_4th DCA Upheld Eck’s Libel Claim (D079835)
2.0) 23/06/05: Eck’s Response to Billauer’s Request for Special Interrogatories
2.0) 23/10/24: Wells Fargo Subpoena Production – EX A in the Mediation Brief
2.0) 24/01/10: Billauer Declaration
2.0) 24/04/15: Billauer’s Mediation Brief
2.0) 24/04/22: Minute Order Settlement Reached (ROA-245)
2.0) Billauer’s Save Del Cerro Website
2.0) Billauer’s Save Del Cerro Brochure
2.0) Billauer’s Church Property Timeline
SECTION 2.1) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. ANDREA CARDENAS AND JESUS CARDENAS, CASE NO. CD301047
2.1) 23/04/04: SDUT article – Cardenas resigns from his City job.
2.1) 23/11/01: SDUT article – Cardenas’ charges
2.1) 23/11/01: Cardenas’ Charging Complaint (CD301047)
2.1) 24/02/28: Andrea Cardenas Plea Agreement (CD301047)
2.1) 24/02/28: Jesus Cardenas Plea Agreement (CD301047)
SECTION 2.2) CITRUS STREET PARTNERS, LLV v CITY OF LEMON GROVE ET AL. – CASE NO; 37-2019-00064690-CU-MC-CTL – PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
2.2) 19/12/05: Citrus Street Partners Verified_Petition_for_Writ_of_Mandate (ROA-1)
2.2) 19/12/05: SUMMONS (ROA-4)
2.2) 20/01/13: Citrus Street Partners Ex Parte Application w Supporting Documents (ROA-12)
2.2) 20/01/14: Minute_Order re TRO Other (ROA-15)
2.2) 20/01/14: City of Lemon Grove Opposition to TRO_Other (ROA-16)
2.2) 20/01/16: Order re TRO Other (ROA-18)
2.2) 20/01/28: KIM Investments Notice_of_Motion_not_specified_in_existing_list (ROA-20)
2.2) 20/01/28: KIM Investments Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities (ROA-21)
2.2) 20/01/28: Gina Austin Declaration iso KIM Investments MTI (ROA-22)
2.2) 20/01/28: KIM Investments Proposed_Order (ROA-23)
2.2) 20/01/30: City of Lemon Grove Opposition_to_Citrus_St_Partners_Order_to_Show_Cause (ROA-26)
2.2) 20/01/30: Declaration_of_Kristen_Steinke_In_Oppo_to_Citrus (ROA-27)
2.2) 20/01/30: City of Lemon Grove Notice_of_Lodgment (ROA-28)
2.2) 20/01/30: City of Lemon Grove Request_for_Judicial_Notice (ROA-29)
2.2) 20/01/30: Notice_of_Case_Reassignment (ROA-31)
2.2) 20/02/05: KIM Investments Notice_of_Motion_to Intervene (ROA-38)
2.2) 20/02/05: KIM Investments MPA iso Motion to Intervene (ROA-39)
2.2) 20/02/05: Gina Austin Declaration (ROA-40)
2.2) 20/02/05: KIM Investments Proposed_Order (ROA-41)
2.2) 20/02/13: Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities iso KIM’s Opposition to Reassign Case (ROA-57)
2.2) 20/02/13: Gina Austin’s Declaration_iso KIM’s Opposition to Reassign Case (ROA-58)
2.2) 20/02/13: KIM Investments Request_for_Judicial_Notice (ROA-59)
2.2) 20/02/18: KIM Investments Ex_Parte_Application_MTI or OST (ROA-68)
2.2) 20/02/18: KIM Investments Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities (ROA-69)
2.2) 20/02/18: Gina Austin’s Declaration iso KIM’s MTI or OST (ROA-70)
2.2) 20/02/18: Richard Andrew’s Declaration_iso KIM’s MTI or OST (ROA-71)
2.2) 20/02/18: Jillette Yousiff’s Declaration iso KIM’s MTI or OST (ROA-72)
2.2) 20/02/18: KIM Investments Request_for_Judicial_Notice (ROA-73)
2.2) 20/02/19: Minute_Order (ROA-80)
2.2) 20/02/18: Citrus St. Partners Opposition_to_KIM’s Application_to_Intervene (ROA-81)
2.2) 20/02/18: Declaration_of_Suzanne_R_Varco iso of Citrus’s Oppostion to KIM’s MTI (ROA-82)
SECTION 3): EXHIBITS
3) 24/10/28: J4C Steering Document
