This section is dedicated to those current Chris Williams’ cases, and those he has pursued in the past. All of these cases show Chris’ interest in defending his constitutionally protected rights and seeing that those who would deprive us of those rights, are exposed in the process. All entries are listed in chronological order by year/month/date and may also include his business enterprises being named in those actions.
SECTION ONE: CITRUS STREET PARTNERS, LLV v CITY OF LEMON GROVE ET AL. – CASE NO; 37-2019-00064690-CU-MC-CTL – PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
2019/12/05: ROA-1_Citrus Street Partners Verified_Petition_for_Writ_of_Mandate
2020/01/13: ROA-12_Citrus Street Partners Ex Parte Application w Supporting Documents
2020/01/14: ROA-15_Minute_Order re TRO Other
2020/01/14: ROA-16_City of Lemon Grove Opposition to TRO_Other
2020/01/16: ROA-18 Order_re TRO Other
2020/01/28: ROA-20 KIM Investments Notice_of_Motion_not_specified_in_existing_list
2020/01/28: ROA-21 KIM Investments Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities
2020/01/28: ROA-22_Gina Austin Declaration iso KIM Investments MTI
2020/01/28: ROA-23_KIM Investments Proposed_Order
2020/01/30: ROA-26_City of Lemon Grove Opposition_to_Citrus_St_Partners_Order_to_Show_Cause
2020/01/30: ROA-27_Declaration_of_Kristen_Steinke_In_Oppo_to_Citrus
2020/01/30: ROA-28_City of Lemon Grove Notice_of_Lodgment
2020/01/30: ROA-29_City of Lemon Grove Request_for_Judicial_Notice
2020/01/30: ROA-31_Notice_of_Case_Reassignment
2020/02/05: ROA-38_KIM Investments Notice_of_Motion_to Intervene
2020/02/05: ROA-39_KIM Investments MPA iso Motion to Intervene
2020/02/05: ROA-40_Gina Austin Declaration
2020/02/05: ROA-41_KIM Investments Proposed_Order
2020/02/13: ROA-57_Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities iso KIM’s Opposition to Reassign Case
2020/02/13: ROA-58_Gina Austin’s Declaration_iso KIM’s Opposition to Reassign Case
2020/02/13: ROA-59_KIM Investments Request_for_Judicial_Notice
2020/02/18: ROA-68_KIM Investments Ex_Parte_Application_MTI or OST
2020/02/18: ROA-69_KIM Investments Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities
2020/02/18: ROA-70_ Gina Austin’s Declaration iso KIM’s MTI or OST
2020/02/18: ROA-71_Richard Andrew’s Declaration_iso KIM’s MTI or OST
2020/02/18: ROA-72_Jillette Yousiff’s Declaration iso KIM’s MTI or OST
2020/02/18: ROA-73_KIM Investments Request_for_Judicial_Notice
2020/02/19: ROA-80_Minute_Order
2020/02/18: ROA-81_Citrus St. Partners Opposition_to_KIM’s Application_to_Intervene
2020/02/18: ROA-82_Declaration_of_Suzanne_R_Varco iso of Citrus’s Oppostion to KIM’s MTI
SECTION TWO: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS v DAVID ARAMBLA ET AL. – CASE NO: 37-2018-00023369-CU-PO-CTL – COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
This complaint stems from a physical altercation which occurred between Chris and Lemon Grove City Counsel member, David Arambla.
2018/05/11: ROA-1_Christopher Williams v David Arambula ET AL_Complaint
2018/06/22: ROA-10_City of Lemon Grove_Answer
2018/06/29: ROA-14_Declaration_of_Emily_M_Straub_iso Arambula’s Motion to Strike
2018/06/29: ROA-15_Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities_iso Arambula’s MTS
2018/10/05: ROA-29_Minute_Order
2018/11/21: ROA-35_City of Lemon Grove’s Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_and_or_Adjudication
2018/12/27: ROA-44_City of Lemon Grove’s Reply_to_William’s Opposition
2018/12/28: ROA-45_Williams’ Objections_to_Defendant_s_Evidence_Submitted on Reply
2019/01/19: ROA-55_Williams’_Brief_In_Opposition_to_Defendant’s_Motion for Summary Judgment
2019/01/25: ROA-56_Williams’ Separate_Statement_of_Disputed_Facts
2019/01/25: ROA-57_Williams’ Objections_to_Evidence_Submitted iso Motion for Summary Judgment
2019/03/08: ROA-69_Declaration_of_Emily_M_Straub iso Arambula’s Motion to Compel
2019/03/08: ROA-70_Separate_Statement iso Arambula’s Motion to Compel
2019/03/08: ROA-7_Notice_of_Lodgment iso Armabula’s Motion to Compel
2019/03/08: ROA-74_Memorandum_of_Points_and_Authorities iso Arambula’s Motion to Compel
2019/06/07: ROA-78_Reply_Brief_ISO_MTC_Depo_Answers_RFP_of_Williams
2019/06/27: ROA-84_Notice_of_Motion_to_Compel_Deposition_Attendance of Matt Mendoza
2019/06/27: ROA-85_Williams’ Opening_Brief_iso_Motion_to Compel Deposition of Matt Mendoza
2019/06/27: ROA-86_Proposed_Order_Granting_Williams’ Motion_for Mendoza and Sanctions
2019/10/18: ROA-89_Wiliams’ Reply_Brief_iso Motion_to_Compel Deposition of Matt Mendoza
2019/10/25: ROA-91_Notice_of_Ruling
2019/12/05: ROA-100_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/05: ROA-103_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-105_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-106_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-107_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-108_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-109_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-110_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-111_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-112_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-113_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-114_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-115_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-116 Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-117_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-118_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-119_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-120_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-121_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-122_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-123_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-124_Motion_in_Limine
2019/12/06: ROA-126_Motion_in_Limine
2022/03/18: ROA-149_Advance_Trial_Review_Order
2022/03/18: Minute_Order
2022/03/22: ROA-154_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_2 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-155_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_3 of 23
2022/08/04: ROA-156_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_4 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-157_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_5 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-158_Wiliams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_6_of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-159_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_7 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA 160_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_9 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-161_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_10 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-162_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_14 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-163_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_15 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-164_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_17 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-165_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_19 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-166_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_21 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-167_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_22 of 23
2022/08/03: ROA-168_Williams’ Opposition_to_Motion_in_Limine_23 of 23
2022/08/04: ROA-169_Williams’ Trial_Brief
2022/08/05: ROA-173_Minute_Order
2022/08/12:ROA-181_Minute_Order
2023/02/03: ROA-185_Minute_Order
2023/02/24: ROA-195_Minute_Order
2023/02/24: ROA-197_Minute_Order
2023/03/01: ROA-207_Minute_Order
2023/03/02: ROA-213_Minutes Finalized for Jury Trial
2023/03/06:ROA-218_Jury_Instructions
2023/02/28: ROA-220_Jury_Instructions
2023/02/28: ROA-221_Arambula’s Exhibit_List
2023/05/10: ROA-222 Judgment Screen Shot
SECTION THREE: RICARDO VIDAL ET AL v. CHRIS WILLIAMS ET AL – CASE NO. 37-2018-00044217-CU-BC-CTL
2018/08/31: ROA-1 Complaint
2022/03/04: ROA-116 Judgment by Court After Trial
SECTION FOUR: BILLAUER v. ECK CASE NO. 37-2021-00006367-CU-DF-CTL
21/02/16: Billauer v. Eck Complaint (ROA-1)
21/03/26: McCaskill Dec iso 30 Day Extension for Demurrer and Motion to Strike (ROA-10)
21/04/28: Eck’s Notice of Demurrer and (ROA-16)
21/04/28: Eck’s MPA iso Eck’s Demurrer (ROA-18)
21/04/28: Dec of Scott McCaskill iso of Ecks Motion to Strike (ROA-22)
21/04/28: MPA iso of Eck’s MTS (ROA-23)
21/04/28: Gina Austin files Eck’s Cross Complaint (ROA-26)
21/06/01: Billauer’s Answer to Eck’s X Complaint (ROA-32)
21/07/14: Billauer’s EP Application for OST and Request to Extend antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-34)
21/07/14: Eck’s Opposition to Billauer’s EP App for OST and Extending antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-35)
21/07/14: McCaskill Dec iso of Eck’s Opp to Billauer’s Extending antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-36)
21/07/15: Minute Order (ROA-38)
21/08/18: Billauer’s Opening Brief (ROA-41)
21/08/18: Billauer’s Notice of Lodging (ROA-42)
21/09/20: Eck’s Dec iso of Opp to Billauer’s Extending antiSLAPP Deadline (ROA-54)
21/09/21: Eck’s Objections in Evidence (ROA-55)
21/09/20: Gina Austin files Eck’s Opposition to Billauer’s MTS (ROA-57)
21/09/20: Billauer’s First Amended Complaint (ROA-58)
21/09/28: Tentative Rulings (ROA-60)
21/09/28: Tentative Rulings (ROA-61)
23/02/28: Billauer v Eck_4th DCA Upheld Eck’s Libel Claim (D079835)
23/06/05: Eck’s Response to Billauer’s Request for Special Interrogatories
23/10/24: Wells Fargo Subpoena Production – EX A in the Mediation Brief
24/01/10: Billauer Declaration
24/04/15: Billauer’s Mediation Brief
24/04/22: Minute Order Settlement Reached (ROA-245)
Billauer’s Save Del Cerro Website
Billauer’s Save Del Cerro Brochure
Billauer’s Church Property Timeline
SECTION FIVE: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. ANDREA CARDENAS AND JESUS CARDENAS, CASE NO. CD301047
23/04/04: SDUT article – Cardenas resigns from his City job.
23/11/01: SDUT article – Cardenas’ charges
23/11/01: Cardenas’ Charging Complaint (CD301047)
24/02/28: Andrea Cardenas Plea Agreement (CD301047)
24/02/28: Jesus Cardenas Plea Agreement (CD301047)
SECTION SIX: EXHIBITS
Taisha Brown 2017 Text v 2019 Sworn Testimony
2022 City of Lemon Grove Audit Results
